Emilia Soldani is an Economist, Maxime Nguyen is a Consultant, Tomomi Tanaka is a Junior Economist, and Orsetta Causa is a Senior Economist, all at the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)
The transition to a greener economy is a necessity (Kanzig 2024). It will require significant shifts in the way goods and energy are produced and consumed (European Parliament 2024) as well as the reallocation of production factors, including workers. Although the overall effects in terms of aggregate economic output and employment could be relatively small, the effects are likely to be concentrated – by economic activity, geographical area, and workers’ characteristics – with a risk of amplifying inequalities in outcomes and opportunities.
In particular, the transition is expected to induce a contraction of jobs in high-polluting activities (often labelled ‘brown’ jobs) and an expansion of so-called ‘green’ jobs, or those involving green activities according to the O*NET classification (Valero et al 2021, Vona et al 2018, Vandeplas et al 2022, Causa et al 2024, Causa and Phillips 2024, O*NET 2010).
A just transition in the labour market should minimise costs for individuals and communities. Achieving this will require policies to improve the allocation of workers and support the re-employment of dismissed ones, especially towards greener occupations, while managing and minimising the scarring effects associated with job losses in polluting industries. In addition, given the marked differences in industrial specialisation across regions, policy interventions should be place-based.
Workers in high-polluting occupations tend to have lower educational attainment (Causa et al 2024). In cases of job dismissal, they often experience larger earnings losses compared with workers in non-energy-intensive and transport sectors (Barreto et al 2024). Comprehensive labour market policies and effective educational systems and upskilling programmes can help mitigate such losses and the risk of scarring, while also accelerating the green transition.
Recent empirical work on a large sample of EU countries (Causa et al 2024) finds that the estimated risk of long-term unemployment for individuals displaced from high-polluting jobs is lower, after accounting for country-specific effects and individual characteristics, in countries where higher shares of the population have a tertiary education and more adults participate in training (Table 1, Panel A).
To facilitate the matching of workers to new jobs, training and active labour market programmes should be complemented with balanced and adequate income support and unemployment benefits, which are associated with a higher probability of transitioning from unemployment to employment, particularly among the long-term unemployed (Table 1, Panel B).
In addition, policies fostering access to quality education and training can help fulfil the increasing demand for workers in green jobs (as defined in Causa et al 2024) since, net of other observable characteristics, the odds of getting a green job are twice as high for workers with high levels of education, especially in STEM fields (Figure 1).
In fact, the transitions from unemployment to green jobs are more likely in countries with higher rates of adult proficiency in literacy and numeracy and a higher share of workers with formal training (Table 1, Panel A).
Figure 1. Transitions from unemployment and inactivity to employment in green jobs
Note: The term ‘green jobs’ indicates the ISCO three-digit occupations which, based on the crosswalk defined in Causa et al. (2024), correspond to the O*NET list (O*NET 2010) of green-enhanced and green-demand occupations. Charts report the estimated odds-ratios from two-steps logit regression estimations for a large panel of European OECD countries over the period 2011–2019, along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. For Panel A, the estimation sample includes individuals who are unemployed in year t-1 and move to employment (in any kind of occupation) by year t, and the binary dependent variable takes value one if the employment in t is in a green job and zero otherwise. For Panel B, the sample includes respondents in the age group 20–29 who are out of the labour force and studying in year t-1 and employed in year t. The dependent variable in Panel B takes value one if the individual is employed in a green job in year t, and zero if in a non-green job. Beyond the independent variables shown in the chart, the regressions include controls for the basic individual characteristics, macro-level cyclical indicators, regional labour market conditions, and economic sector, region, and country fixed effects. Further details in Causa et al (2024).
Source: Causa et al (2024).
In terms of promoting transitions from joblessness to employment in green jobs, beyond the key role of education and training, labour market institutions are instrumental. These include active labour market policies, cash support to unemployed workers, and well-designed institutions to promote effective collective wage bargaining and social dialogue.
Progress in this area is particularly beneficial for women, less-educated workers, and those living in rural areas (Table 1, Panel A). Policies like training, public employment services that support job searches (PES), and employment incentives are associated with higher chances of transitioning from non-employment to green jobs for higher-educated workers (Table 1, Panel B). While not causal, this association suggests the need to better design and target such policies for more exposed and vulnerable workers, especially those with lower education levels.
Our findings demonstrate that structural policies known to support labour market inclusiveness and efficiency are also likely to support a green transition that is both smooth and fair
On the other hand, the transition from unemployment to green jobs is less likely in countries with relatively high employment protection and product markets and occupational entry regulations that hinder business and labour market dynamism (Table 1, Panel C).
Such an association is particularly strong for vulnerable groups, like lower-educated individuals and those just entering the labour force after completing their studies. These results are in line with the general literature on the effects of employment protection legislation on job-finding rates and labour market transitions (Bassanini and Garnero 2013, Causa et al 2022, Scarpetta 2014).
Table 1. Policies to support labour market transitions into a greener economy
Note: In the table, the expression ‘green jobs’ indicates the ISCO three-digit occupations which, based on the crosswalk defined in Causa et al. (2024), correspond to the O*NET list (O*NET 2010) of green-enhanced and green-demand occupations. The symbol ‘>’ indicates a positive association (for example: an increase in the mean literacy score is associated with an increase in the probability of getting a job in a green-skill occupation); ‘<’ indicates a negative association (for example, stronger employment protection on regular contracts is associated with lower probabilities of getting any job); and ‘-‘ indicates the absence of a statistically significant association between the policy and the outcome. When considering sub-populations, such as younger or older workers or women, the sign ‘>>’ (‘<<’) indicates that the association is positive (negative) and significantly more so than the association found for the general population. All associations are computed ceteris paribus, ie. holding fixed the observable characteristics of workers, the year of the survey, the country and the corresponding macro-economic conditions, and, when relevant, the industry of occupation. For details on the sample and estimation see Causa et al (2024).
The labour market literature shows that housing policies favouring residential mobility tend to facilitate the spatial reallocation of workers and promote business dynamism, enhancing the ability of workers to seize job opportunities (Causa et al 2021, Causa et al 2020, Andrews et al 2011).
This is also the case in the context of the green transition: for example, hirings from studies are hindered by strong house price dynamics, with higher house prices acting as possible barriers to geographical mobility. Social rental housing and the provision of housing allowances (ie. housing-related monetary benefits) increase the odds of an individual moving from joblessness to a job, including a green job, with the benefits of housing allowances being more widespread than those of social housing.
At the same time, these housing support policies are associated with significantly lower risks of long-term unemployment, especially for lower-educated individuals. Finally, reducing excessively rigid rental market regulations could also lift barriers to geographical mobility and enhance transitions from joblessness to employment (Table 1, Panel D).
Our findings demonstrate that structural policies known to support labour market inclusiveness and efficiency are also likely to support a green transition that is both smooth and fair. Yet, they also highlight that the impact of the transition to a greener economy and climate mitigation policies is uneven across socioeconomic groups characterised by different educational and skill background as well as geographical areas, such as territories and regions characterised by different industrial specialisation structures.
Successful policy experiences in the past can help national and sub-national governments build tailored approaches to support an efficient and fair labour market transition process.
References
Adalet McGowan, M and D Andrews (2017), “Skills mismatch, productivity and policies: Evidence from the second wave of PIAAC”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1403.
Andre, C and P Gal (2024), Reviving productivity growth: A review of policies, forthcoming.
Andrews, D, A Caldera Sánchez and Å Johansson (2011), “Housing Markets and Structural Policies in OECD Countries”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 836.
Barreto, C et al (2024), “The ‘clean energy transition’ and the cost of job displacement in energy-intensive industries”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 310.
Bassanini, A and A Garnero (2013), “Dismissal protection and worker flows in OECD countries: Evidence from cross-country/cross-industry data”, Labour Economics 21, 25–41.
Bilal, A and D Känzig (2024), “Why Global Temperature Matters”, VoxEU.org, 21 July.
Boal, W and M Ransom (1997), “Monopsony in the Labor Market”, Journal of Economic Literature 35(1).
Boeri, T and M Burda (1996), “Active labor market policies, job matching and the Czech miracle”, European Economic Review 40(3–5).
Borgonovi, F et al (2023), “The effects of the EU Fit for 55 package on labour markets and the demand for skills”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 297.
Bowen, A, K Kuralbayeva and E Tipoe (2018), “Characterising green employment: The impacts of ‘greening’ on workforce composition”, Energy Economics 72: 263–75.
Card, D, J Kluve and A Weber (2015), “What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations”, NBER Working Paper 21431.
Causa, O, M Abendschein and M Cavalleri (2021), “The laws of attraction: Economic drivers of inter-regional migration, housing costs and the role of policies”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1679.
Causa, O et al (2022), “Getting on the job ladder: The policy drivers of hiring transitions”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1710.
Causa, O, N Luu and M Abendschein (2021), “Labour Market Transitions across the OECD: Stylised Facts”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1692.
Causa, O, M Nguyen and E Soldani (2024), A new measurement approach for indentifying high-polluting jobs across European countries.
Causa, O, M Nguyen and E Soldani (2024), Lost in the green transition: Measurement and stylised facts.
Causa, O and T Phillips (2024), “It’s a dirty job”, VoxTalk, 21 June.
Causa, O and J Pichelmann (2020), “Should I stay or should I go? Housing and residential mobility across OECD countries”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1626.
Causa, O, E Soldani and M Nguyen (2024), “Lost in the green transition? Measurement and stylized facts”, VoxEU.org, 28 May.
Causa, O et al (2024), “Labour markets transitions in the greening economy: Structural drivers and the role of policies”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1803.
Chateau, J, R Bibas and E Lanzi (2018), “Impacts of Green Growth Policies on Labour Markets and Wage Income Distribution: A General Equilibrium Application to Climate and Energy Policies”, OECD Environment Working Papers, no. 137.
Consoli, D et al (2016), “Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital?”, Research Policy 45(5): 1046–60.
Demetriades, S, J Cabrita and K Fóti (2021), “Distributional impacts of climate policies in Europe”, Eurofound.
European Parliament (2024), Social and labour market impact of the green transition.
Känzig, D (2023), “The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing”, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Lopez-Garcia, P (2009), “Business Environment and Labor Market Outcomes in European and Central Asian Countries”, Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 12(4).
OECD (2023), Economic Policy Reforms 2023: Going for Growth, Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2023), Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2023), Job Creation and Local Economic Development 2023: Bridging the Great Green Divide, Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2023), Joining Forces for Gender Equality: What is Holding us Back?, Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2017), The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pisani-Ferry, J (2021), “Climate policy is macroeconomic policy, and the implications will be significant”, PIIE Policy Brief, no. 21–20.
Scarpetta, S (2014), “Employment protection”, The IZA World of Labor.
Soldani, E et al (2024), Policy approaches to reduce inequalities while boosting productivity growth, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Valero, A et al (2021), “Are ‘green’ jobs good jobs? How lessons from the experience to-date can inform labour market transitions of the future”, Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics.
Vandeplas, A et al (2022), The possible implications of the green transition for the EU labour market, European Commission.
Vandyck, T et al (2021), “Climate policy design, competitiveness and income distribution: A macro-micro assessment for 11 EU countries”, Energy Economics 103, 105538.
Vona, F, G Marin and D Consoli (2018), “Green employment: What, where and how much?”, Sciences Po publications.
This article was originally published on VoxEU.org.